CANADA NEEDS ONLINE SAFETY LAWS
Canada is one of the safest places in the world for children.
Unless they’re online.
Share the campaign:
Everyday, Canadian children are preyed-upon, exploited, and exposed to harmful content in the digital spaces they increasingly occupy. Canada does not have a comprehensive regulatory framework that can provide children with a high degree of protections online, just as they do, and we all expect, offline.
Jurisdictions like the U.K., Australia, and the European Union already have, or are now implementing, regulations that will impose safety requirements online to protect children from harms that are known and predictable.
The Canadian Centre for Child Protection (C3P) urges members of Parliament to prioritize the establishment of online safety laws in Canada.
Contents
- Why does C3P support online safety laws in Canada?
- Hear from Canadian moms
- C3P’s findings
- Tech Harm Timeline
- What can you do?
Why does C3P support online safety laws in Canada?
- Because the numbers from social media companies themselves tell us there’s a big problem. Their industry reports that 65% of teen users have been targeted by sexual offenders.1 Meta, for its part, estimates around 100,000 kids per day are sexually targeted across their platforms.2
- Because it will give Canadian children rights and protections in online spaces — like they have offline.
- Because it finally signals to an unregulated industry that is often described as one with the motto “move fast and break things” that it cannot cut corners on ethics and safety in the mad rush to commercialize the attention of our children.
- Because relying on criminal law will not stop the harms happening to children online - we must prevent them from happening. For example, a criminal law in Canada does little for a child who was victimized by an offender overseas, but a regulation that forces social media to implement safety by design could help stop the victimization from occurring in the first place.
Hear why online safety laws are needed from Canadian moms whose children were sexually victimized online:
Unprecedented level of sexual abuse and violence against children
- In the last two years, Cybertip.ca has received nearly 7,000 reports alone from youth being sexually extorted, mainly through Instagram and Snapchat. This issue is of epidemic proportion with a number of youths also dying by suicide as a result of the torment they faced by online predators.
- The explosion of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is incomprehensible. Project Arachnid often issues upwards of 20,000 removal requests involving CSAM every day to service providers around the world.
- We are regularly observing children as young as six being coerced over livestream into a sexual act while using insufficiently moderated platforms. Unbeknown to these children, offenders are then recording them to share on the dark web and other spaces.
- In recent years, we have observed growing online networks of adults with a problematic sexual interest in children. These online communities share illegal material, talk about their CSAM collections, encourage each other, and share tactics — including “how to” manuals (essentially, “how to sexually harm and evade consequences”). Of critical concern, many in these communities obsess over certain victims, try to locate them, and even stalk them well into adulthood.
Tech Harm Timeline: Failures by the tech industry to protect its users
We believe what matters is actions, not words. Our Tech Harm Timeline documents example after example of tech companies failing to protect their users, especially children.
This timeline shows why Canada desperately needs regulation for online platforms.
What can you do?
Reach out to your MP and tell them online regulation is important to you. Visit here for more information.
- 1 Beauchere, J. (2023, October 16). Two-thirds of Gen Z targeted for online “sextortion” — New Snap research. WeProtect Global Alliance. https://www.weprotect.org/blog/two-thirds-of-gen-z-targeted-for-online-sextortion-new-snap-research/ ↩
- 2 New Mexico v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 1:23-cv-01115-MIS-KK (D.N.M. Feb. 5, 2024) ↩